0.17/0.17 % Problem : Vampire---4.8_25906 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.18/0.18 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.18/0.39 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu 0.18/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.18/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.18/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.18/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.18/0.39 % CPULimit : 1440 0.18/0.39 % WCLimit : 180 0.18/0.39 % DateTime : Mon Jul 3 13:05:08 EDT 2023 0.18/0.39 % CPUTime : 0.35/0.59 Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oSID6tRPHm/Vampire---4.8_25906 0.35/0.59 # Version: 3.1pre001-ho 0.43/0.76 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLCHFA. 0.43/0.76 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.43/0.76 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.43/0.76 # Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.43/0.76 # Starting lpo8_s with 180s (1) cores 0.43/0.76 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 180s (1) cores 0.43/0.76 # sh5l with pid 26085 completed with status 0 0.43/0.76 # Result found by sh5l 0.43/0.76 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLCHFA. 0.43/0.76 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.43/0.76 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.43/0.76 # Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.43/0.76 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000 0.43/0.76 # Search class: HGUSM-FSLM31-DHFFFMBN 0.43/0.76 # partial match(1): HGUSM-FSLM32-DHFFFMBN 0.43/0.76 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.43/0.76 # Starting new_ho_10 with 109s (1) cores 0.43/0.76 # new_ho_10 with pid 26088 completed with status 0 0.43/0.76 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.43/0.76 # Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLCHFA. 0.43/0.76 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.43/0.76 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.43/0.76 # Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores 0.43/0.76 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000 0.43/0.76 # Search class: HGUSM-FSLM31-DHFFFMBN 0.43/0.76 # partial match(1): HGUSM-FSLM32-DHFFFMBN 0.43/0.76 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.43/0.76 # Starting new_ho_10 with 109s (1) cores 0.43/0.76 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s 0.43/0.76 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.43/0.76 0.43/0.76 # Proof found! 0.43/0.76 # SZS status Theorem 0.43/0.76 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.43/0.76 thf(decl_56, type, heapIm837449470Leaf_a: tree_a > produc143150363Tree_a). 0.43/0.76 thf(decl_61, type, e_a: tree_a). 0.43/0.76 thf(decl_62, type, t_a: a > tree_a > tree_a > tree_a). 0.43/0.76 thf(decl_64, type, is_heap_a: tree_a > $o). 0.43/0.76 thf(decl_81, type, produc686083979Tree_a: a > tree_a > produc143150363Tree_a). 0.43/0.76 thf(decl_120, type, product_snd_a_Tree_a: produc143150363Tree_a > tree_a). 0.43/0.76 thf(decl_135, type, v: a). 0.43/0.76 thf(conj_0, conjecture, (is_heap_a @ (product_snd_a_Tree_a @ (heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ (t_a @ v @ e_a @ e_a)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oSID6tRPHm/Vampire---4.8_25906', conj_0)). 0.43/0.76 thf(fact_16_removeLeaf_Osimps_I1_J, axiom, ![X49:a]:(((heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ (t_a @ X49 @ e_a @ e_a))=(produc686083979Tree_a @ X49 @ e_a))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oSID6tRPHm/Vampire---4.8_25906', fact_16_removeLeaf_Osimps_I1_J)). 0.43/0.76 thf(fact_29_snd__conv, axiom, ![X119:a, X120:tree_a]:(((product_snd_a_Tree_a @ (produc686083979Tree_a @ X119 @ X120))=(X120))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oSID6tRPHm/Vampire---4.8_25906', fact_29_snd__conv)). 0.43/0.76 thf(fact_10_is__heap_Osimps_I1_J, axiom, (is_heap_a @ e_a), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oSID6tRPHm/Vampire---4.8_25906', fact_10_is__heap_Osimps_I1_J)). 0.43/0.76 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(is_heap_a @ (product_snd_a_Tree_a @ (heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ (t_a @ v @ e_a @ e_a)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])). 0.43/0.76 thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X1644:a]:(((heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ (t_a @ X1644 @ e_a @ e_a))=(produc686083979Tree_a @ X1644 @ e_a))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_16_removeLeaf_Osimps_I1_J])). 0.43/0.76 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~((is_heap_a @ (product_snd_a_Tree_a @ (heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ (t_a @ v @ e_a @ e_a))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 0.43/0.76 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X13:a]:(((heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ (t_a @ X13 @ e_a @ e_a))=(produc686083979Tree_a @ X13 @ e_a))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.43/0.76 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X1627:a, X1628:tree_a]:(((product_snd_a_Tree_a @ (produc686083979Tree_a @ X1627 @ X1628))=(X1628))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_29_snd__conv])). 0.43/0.76 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~((is_heap_a @ (product_snd_a_Tree_a @ (produc686083979Tree_a @ v @ e_a)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])). 0.43/0.76 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X13:a, X1:tree_a]:(((product_snd_a_Tree_a @ (produc686083979Tree_a @ X13 @ X1))=(X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.43/0.76 thf(c_0_11, plain, (is_heap_a @ e_a), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_10_is__heap_Osimps_I1_J])). 0.43/0.76 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10]), c_0_11])]), ['proof']). 0.43/0.76 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.43/0.76 # Parsed axioms : 484 0.43/0.76 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 223 0.43/0.76 # Initial clauses : 646 0.43/0.76 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 48 0.43/0.76 # Initial clauses in saturation : 598 0.43/0.76 # Processed clauses : 651 0.43/0.76 # ...of these trivial : 44 0.43/0.76 # ...subsumed : 174 0.43/0.76 # ...remaining for further processing : 433 0.43/0.76 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 35 0.43/0.76 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.43/0.76 # Backward-subsumed : 1 0.43/0.76 # Backward-rewritten : 2 0.43/0.76 # Generated clauses : 48 0.43/0.76 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 35 0.43/0.76 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.43/0.76 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.43/0.76 # Paramodulations : 4 0.43/0.76 # Factorizations : 0 0.43/0.76 # NegExts : 0 0.43/0.76 # Equation resolutions : 35 0.43/0.76 # Total rewrite steps : 132 0.43/0.76 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.43/0.76 # Propositional check models : 0 0.43/0.76 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.43/0.76 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.43/0.76 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.43/0.76 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.43/0.76 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.43/0.76 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.43/0.76 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.43/0.76 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.43/0.76 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.43/0.76 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.43/0.76 # Current number of processed clauses : 28 0.43/0.76 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 23 0.43/0.76 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.43/0.76 # Negative unit clauses : 3 0.43/0.76 # Non-unit-clauses : 2 0.43/0.76 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 349 0.43/0.76 # ...number of literals in the above : 1252 0.43/0.76 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.43/0.76 # Current number of archived clauses : 370 0.43/0.76 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 49671 0.43/0.76 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5257 0.43/0.76 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 186 0.43/0.76 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 345 0.43/0.76 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.43/0.76 # BW rewrite match attempts : 36 0.43/0.76 # BW rewrite match successes : 2 0.43/0.76 # Condensation attempts : 651 0.43/0.76 # Condensation successes : 12 0.43/0.76 # Termbank termtop insertions : 63470 0.43/0.76 0.43/0.76 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.43/0.76 # User time : 0.129 s 0.43/0.76 # System time : 0.010 s 0.43/0.76 # Total time : 0.139 s 0.43/0.76 # Maximum resident set size: 5200 pages 0.43/0.77 0.43/0.77 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.43/0.77 # User time : 0.147 s 0.43/0.77 # System time : 0.012 s 0.43/0.77 # Total time : 0.159 s 0.43/0.77 # Maximum resident set size: 2824 pages 0.43/0.77 % E---3.1 exiting 0.43/0.77 EOF